EFF-C-071 : Prefectural order of the environmental authority: flora component
Effinature criterion · theme: Species and habitats
The Effinature criterion “Prefectural order of the environmental authority: flora component” (EFF-C-071) belongs to the Species and habitats theme and applies to the EVO/HOR/NCO reference framework(s). It maps to 30 international provision(s), including strong matches with ESRS E4 (SBM-3), Taxonomie UE (7.1-SC-b), Taxonomie UE (DNSH-BIO-EIE).
International correspondences (30)
| Framework | Provision | Relation | Confidence | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESRS E4 | SBM-3 | Narrow match | Indicative (55%) | The prefectural order (flora/fauna component) attests to the protected species affected and the competent responsible authority. |
| SBTN | S1b-R12 | Related match | Low | The initial states and fauna/flora preservation programmes include the site's protected and sensitive species (prefectural orders, EVEE), close to the SBTN requirement to include IUCN/CITES threatened species, but without explicit reference to IUCN/CITES lists. |
| Taxonomie UE | 7.1-SC-b | Close match | Medium | The environmental impact assessment, worksite monitoring by the ecologist and fauna/flora preservation programmes constitute the EIA and its mitigation measures. |
| Taxonomie UE | DNSH-BIO-EIE | Close match | Medium | The environmental impact assessment and prefectural 'flora/fauna component' orders transpose the appropriate assessment under the Habitats/Birds Directives. |
| SFDR | PAI-T2-PROTAREA | Related match | Indicative (50%) | The flora-component prefectural order frames the impacts on protected species and regulated areas, consistent with the opt-in indicator. |
| ISO 17298 | 6.3 | Close match | High | The ISO identification of material impacts on biodiversity corresponds to Effinature's ecological analyses (flora, fauna) and the project's environmental impact assessments. |
| ISO 17298 | 6.5 | Narrow match | Medium | The ISO prioritisation of impacts translates at project level into the effective prioritisation carried out by Effinature's environmental impact assessments, which rank and grade the impacts to be addressed. A real operational correspondence on the impacts component (narrow: does not encompass the organisational dependencies/risks/opportunities component of the ISO). |
| GRESB | GRESB-BI1-TE | Narrow match | Indicative (55%) | Prefectural environmental authorisation (flora) addresses protected species requiring derogation. |
| GBF | Target 4 | Narrow match | Medium | The requirements for inventory, preservation and monitoring of local fauna, sealing of trap cavities, shelters and management of sensitive periods aim to protect and re-establish animal species, particularly threatened ones, present on the site. |
| GBF | Target 12 | Narrow match | Medium | These requirements for the choice, planting, management and monitoring of plant heritage improve the quality and durability of urban green spaces, contributing more specifically to the target's objective. |
| GBF | Target 14 | Close match | High | The initial states, environmental impact assessments, prefectural orders, environmental specifications (CPAUPE) and ecological assessments formally integrate biodiversity into the project's planning and impact assessment. |
| Habitats/Oiseaux | HAB-Art13 | Close match | Medium (75%) | The flora-component prefectural order frames the regulatory protection of plant species. |
| Habitats/Oiseaux | HAB-Art16 | Close match | Medium (75%) | The flora-component prefectural order formalises the conditions for derogation from the protection of plant species. |
| Code env. | L411-2-4 | Close match | Medium (70%) | The prefectural order of the environmental authority, flora component, materialises the protected-species derogation for flora. |
| Code env. | L122-1 | Narrow match | Indicative (50%) | The prefectural order of the environmental authority, flora component, is a deliverable of the environmental assessment procedure. |
| Doctrine ERC | ERC-P11 | Close match | High | The 'flora component' prefectural order frames the preservation of habitats/flora of regulatory concern. |
| ÉcoQuartier | Engagement 20 | Broad match | High | The ÉcoQuartier's preservation/restoration of plant biodiversity encompasses this Effinature requirement relating to flora, the plant palette, building greening and biodiversity areas. |
| BNG | BNG-04 | Narrow match | Indicative (55%) | The assessment of development-related biodiversity loss corresponds, in Effinature, to the environmental impact assessment and prefectural orders (flora/fauna components) that characterise the harm, as well as to the preservation of the initial heritage. |
| IFC PS6 | PS6-§14 | Narrow match | Indicative (55%) | The 'flora-component' prefectural order (derogations, prescriptions) constitutes the regulatory mechanism by which Effinature frames the conversion/degradation of habitats, a partial but concrete response to PS6. |
| IFC PS6 | PS6-§16 | Related match | Indicative (30%) | Effinature has no notion of critical habitat; only the regulatory framework for protected species (prefectural order) is weakly related. |
| IFC PS6 | PS6-§20 | Narrow match | Indicative (50%) | The 'flora-component' prefectural order materialises the required regulatory analysis of protected perimeters, within the field of French legally protected areas. |
| ESS6 | ESS6-§21-22 | Narrow match | Indicative (55%) | The 'flora-component' prefectural order (derogations, prescriptions) constitutes the regulatory mechanism by which Effinature frames the conversion/degradation of habitats, a partial but concrete response. |
| ESS6 | ESS6-§26-27 | Narrow match | Indicative (50%) | The 'flora-component' prefectural order materialises the regulatory analysis of protected perimeters, within the field of French legally protected areas. |
| EP4 | EP-P2 | Close match | Medium (70%) | Effinature's environmental impact assessment and prefectural orders (flora/fauna components) constitute the impact-assessment process and regulatory analysis required by Principle 2. |
| EP4 | EP-P3 | Narrow match | Indicative (55%) | Effinature's impact assessment and prefectural orders concretely apply, within the scope of French protected-species/habitat law, the regulatory-compliance requirement of Principle 3 (the IFC PS6 reference remaining an international lending standard not transposed as such). |
| EP4 | EP-DII-4 | Narrow match | Indicative (55%) | The identification of legally protected areas in Document II §4 is covered, within the scope of French law (Natura 2000, ZNIEFF, orders), by Effinature's prefectural orders and impact assessment, without the international notion of critical habitat. |
| Green Star | GSB-NAT-SITE | Related match | Low | Green Star's EPBC screening / referral to the federal minister is analogous to Effinature's reliance on the prefectural authorisation of the environmental authority (flora). Different jurisdictions, similar regulatory-gate function. |
| Green Star | GSDAB-LUE-COND | Related match | Low | EPBC screening for flora/wetland protection parallels Effinature's prefectural authorisation of the environmental authority (flora volet). |
| ISO 17620 | 7.2.3 | Narrow match | Medium (60%) | The 'component' prefectural order formalises the regulatory conclusions of the environmental assessment. |
| SITES | Soil+Veg C4.5 | Related match | Indicative (50%) | Conservation of vegetation with protected status = flora-component prefectural order. |
Source & licence
- Publisher : IRICE (groupe NORMAXIS)
- Accreditation : Cofrac (Comité français d'accréditation) n°5-0655 rév. 1 (NF EN ISO/IEC 17065:2012), scope at www.cofrac.fr
- Dataset version : 9.1
- Licence : CC BY-ND 4.0